The repository carried no licence at all, which meant nobody could legally
build on it and the question of what a derivative owes back had no answer.
The AGPL rather than the GPL because this is a web application: under the
GPL, running a modified copy as a hosted service obliges the operator to
publish nothing, and a workflow platform is exactly the kind of thing
someone hosts. Section 13 closes that.
The additional term is the part that carries the intent - section 7(b)
permits requiring that author attributions be preserved in the Appropriate
Legal Notices a work displays, so the attribution has to survive into a
derivative's interface and not merely into a file nobody opens. It is a
permitted additional requirement, not a further restriction, so downstream
cannot strip it.
Academic citation is a request in CITATION.cff, not a licence condition:
no OSI licence can compel a citation, and pretending otherwise would put an
unenforceable clause in a document that needs to be enforceable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Fix memory leak in task-executions polling (DestroyRef)
- Fix race condition in flows service (error recovery)
- Add centralized NotificationService + GlobalNotificationComponent
- Convert main routes to lazy loading (loadComponent)
- Remove static state from auth interceptor
- Write real unit tests (guards, stores, services)
- Strengthen HFNodeData types (explicit properties)
- Extract pure functions from TaskExecutionViewer into utils
- Add console.warn logging to guards on access denied
- Expand runtime config (apiUrl, assistantEnabled, tourModeAlwaysOn, turnstileEnabled)
- Document FormUtility and ListStateViewHolder base classes
- Remove unused lucide-angular dependency
- Replace ngModel with signal bindings in flows-list/blocks-list
- Use :where() for global mat-form-field override
- Document design system tokens in styles.css
Lucio Lelii