Mechanical: three comment lines at the top of every .ts, .html and .css
under src, and nothing else. Split out from the licence commit so the
files that carry an actual change stay readable in the history, and kept
to its own commit because it moves the blame line on 390 files.
The short SPDX form rather than the full GNU notice - it is
machine-readable under REUSE, it satisfies the requirement to keep the
licence notice intact, and it points at LICENSE-ADDENDUM instead of
restating the attribution term in every file.
The template and stylesheet headers do not reach the bundle: Angular
discards template comments and the production build strips CSS ones. The
one in index.html survives, since that file is served as written, which is
no loss.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A flow result is built only from *unconnected* outputs, so wiring the last block
into an End node moves its value out of the result and into the outcome payload -
which nothing in the UI read. The run then looked like it produced nothing at all.
There is already an execution in a local database whose outcome payload is a full
generated rejection email that was invisible for exactly this reason.
The run view now has an Outcomes section above the graph, listing each End the run
passed through: its code, its label, the step it came from, and its payload. An
End reached with no value says so, rather than showing an empty box - the two
cases mean different things.
A text payload renders as text rather than through the JSON tree. The tree would
have kept the line breaks but wraps strings in quotes, and the common case here is
a generated document, not a data structure.
This is the smallest of the options for the underlying gap: the data was already
persisted and already in the API payload, so nothing in the engine changed. The
gap itself remains - End cannot be attached as a pure ordering dependency
(canDependOnOtherNodes is false), so a single-exit flow still has to choose
between a labelled end and a value in `result`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Projects group the flow list in place: no new page or tab, the existing sidebar
list gains collapsible per-project sections plus a project filter. Everything is
behind PROJECTS_ENABLED in shared/feature-flags, and with no projects the list
renders exactly as it did before - flows-list.spec guards that.
FlowsList stays the single owner of the load, filter, sort and list state; the
grouping is extracted into a pure flow-grouping.ts and a presentational
flows-group component. A wrapper rendering N flows lists would have re-registered
the same list state and re-triggered the load N times. The group chrome mirrors
tasks-executions-list, which already implements collapsible groups, so the two
sidebars read as one product.
toFlowCreateRequest deliberately still carries no project. It builds the
full-replace PUT the editor issues on every save, so a project sent there would
be silently dropped each time; membership changes only through
assignFlowToProject. flow-mapper.spec guards it.
Deleting a project destroys its flows, so it gets its own dialog rather than a
wider ConfirmDialogService: it names the count, lists the flows, says that
finalized flows go too - which the flow list otherwise forbids - and requires the
project name to be typed. Widening the shared confirm service for one destructive
caller would have rippled through every other call site.
Moving a flow between projects is a menu item, not drag-and-drop: the sidebar is
320px with its own scroll, and the whole card is already a click target, so a
drag gesture would fight the open-flow gesture. Flow order inside a project uses
up/down arrows for the same reason.
Shared context is edited in a dialog modelled on the Global Inputs panel, which
is the mental model users already have for ${{global.x}}; the title toolbar shows
the inherited values read-only, because that is where prompts are written.
"Run project" creates and starts a run - creating alone would look like nothing
happened. Runs come back BLOCKED or STOPPED when a step needs inputs or failed,
and the UI says so instead of claiming progress. Project runs surface in /tasks
as sibling groups labelled with a project chip, derived in tasks-executor: no
second nesting level and no backend change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lucio Lelii